Digital communication technology, such as email, instant messaging and social media, has improved communication and cinnections between people.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opipnion.
Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Technological innovations has significantly improved communication between people of today's world. People can now interact with one another, even how many miles apart they are, using messaging platforms on the internet. But does this mean better communication and connectivity is achieved? While I completely agree that communicating is just a click away, I I highly disagree that personal relations are improved too.
To begin with, social media, mobile messaging applications, and email has totally changed the game of communication. We are now able to utilise these digital methods as free, fast and convenient way to send and receive messages. For example, since almost everyone is on Facebook, messages can be totally delivered in a speedy way and with ease, and can be shared with others without a person appearing to them. People can save money on phone bills and travel fees. Thus, convenience is achieved.
On the contrary, building connections with people online may not be considered genuine. Conversing with a person via the internet does not mean they truly are at the same page as it can conceal the real feelings and reactions of an individual. For instance, online dating has below 50% success rate because connecting screen-to screen does not justify the realness of a person. Hence, in terms of improved connectivity, distant communication is improbable.
Advances in digital communication has been immensely beneficial to the people around the world. Personal conversation through meeting people in flesh is the only way to better connectivity. While I certainly agree that communication has improved , the notion of connectivity in terms of building relationships online will never be achieved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | manaswi.ielts | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-27 | Traxie_Nguyen | 84 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | zeborah | 73 | view |
- The tables below show the value of Australia's trade with China, the USA and Japan from 2012-2015 in billions of Australian dollars. 56
- Research are essential for developing new medicines and treatment to get better health and less disease.Who individual, private companies or government should fund these researches 11
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Digital communication technology, such as email, instant messaging and social media, has improved communication and cinnections between people.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opipnion.Give reasons for your answer and include examples fro 73
- The graph above shows the stock price of four technology companies between 2011 and 2016 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: I
...hat communicating is just a click away, I I highly disagree that personal relations...
^^^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a speedy way" with adverb for "speedy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...book, messages can be totally delivered in a speedy way and with ease, and can be shared with o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d. Personal conversation through meeting people in flesh is the only way to bette...
^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ly agree that communication has improved , the notion of connectivity in terms of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42910447761 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09592452921 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615671641791 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8161155296 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9375 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195636300083 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065795822117 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525710954694 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121347237657 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457320165005 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.