The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the percentages of divorces in Finland and Sweden in 5 years, specifically between 2011 and 2015.
Overall, both countries experienced slight fluctuations on the first three years. Divorce rates in Finland increased steadily throughout the period whilst Sweden gradually decreased. although Sweden commenced with a considerably higher percentage, with its downward trend, it finished off lower than Finland.
In detail, Finland started off well over 30% but notably lower than Sweden in 2011. It experienced slight fluctuations in 2012 and 2013 with its divorce rates around 33% and 39% respectively. By the next two years, it remained relatively stable at slightly over 40%.
Meanwhile, Sweden's percentage of divorce began significantly higher than Finland, with around 45%, approximately 8% difference. It peaked at almost 50% in 2012 and fell steadily on the following years. It concluded at about 38% in 2015 and became markedly lower than Finland.
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph above shows the stock price of four technology companies between 2011 and 2016 77
- Digital communication technology, such as email, instant messaging and social media, has improved communication and cinnections between people.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opipnion.Give reasons for your answer and include examples fro 73
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 81
- The tables below show the value of Australia's trade with China, the USA and Japan from 2012-2015 in billions of Australian dollars. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
THE BAR CHART ILLUSTRATES THE PERCENTAGES OF DIVORCES IN FINLAND A...
^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...LATIVELY STABLE WITH SLIGHTLY OVER 40%. MEANWHILE, SWEDENS PERCENTAGE OF DIVORCE...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58666666667 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94561067051 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.64 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.1047388044 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.8 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11074904619 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501512816503 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515887336171 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0888725319761 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601429034016 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.55 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.