The graph and chart below give information about migration to the UK. The graph below shows how long immigrants in the year 2000-2008 intended to stay in the UK. And the pie-chart shows reasons for migration in 2008.
The graphs show how long did the immigrants intend to stay in the UK as well as why they moved to this country in the period of 2000 and 2008.
Overall, while the number of people deciding to live in the UK from two to four years and up to two years witnessed an uptick, the 4-or-more-year group remained unchanged. Working, additionally, was the main reasons behind this immigration.
The number of immigrants staying in the UK in more than 4 years leveled off, at 150 thousand. The similar trend occurred in the up-to-2-year group in the two first years but then it started to surge up and peak at 250 thousand, which cementing its position as the most suitable duration for the immigrants. Conversely, from 2000 to 2006, the figure for the two-to-four-year counterpart fluctuated around just over 50 thousand and later modestly increased to more than a hundred.
In 2008, working is the most common factor for the UK immigration which accounted for nearly 40%. A third of people moved to the UK in 2008 for studying, double that for accompanying or joining family purpose. The percentage of people moving to this region without any stated reason and other purposes were the same, at 7% each.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, so, then, third, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 992.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76923076923 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77430091413 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4846361402 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.222222222 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266286300336 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115180774538 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995583562984 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17973303892 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107246715582 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, so, then, third, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 992.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76923076923 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77430091413 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4846361402 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.222222222 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266286300336 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115180774538 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995583562984 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17973303892 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107246715582 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.