The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The line graph and table illustrates about utilisation of water globally in thrice sectors and it's consumption in two different nations.
To begin with, it is clear by analysing line graph that, during 1900, higher utilisation of water includes in agriculture sector (500 km3). However, other two sections started from similar count which was near to zero. Apart from that, in next two decades, usage of water in agriculture sector increased significantly upto 1500km3 in comparison to other couple of sectors as these were boosted with little count of 100km3. Yet, industrial sector used higher number during further twice years with 500km3. Whereas, usage of water for domestic purpose remained similar. On other hand, agriculture sector rapidly boosted their usage till 2000 year with 5000km3. On contrast, industrial was also gone upto 500km3. However, in last year, usage in domestic practices also lead towards higher count (400km3) respectively.
In addition, by analysing table, it is clear that, higher population rate is considered in Brazil (176 million) rather than in Democratic republic of Congo (5.2 million). Similarly, consumption of water for irrigation of land is on highest number in Brazil (26,500km3) rather than in other nation, Congo (100km3). Once again, there is huge difference in number of water consumption by per person where in Brazil 359km3 and in Congo 8km3 respectively.
Overall, in line graph, agriculture sector is on peak count during all eras. Moreover, in table, Brazil has maximum number in all sections of consumption of water.
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment Only government and large companies can make a difference What extent do you agree or disagree 21
- Parents should encourage children spend less time on studying and more time on doing physical activities To what extent do you agree 78
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantage of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 84
- People buy a product if it fulfills their needs there is no need for advertisement To what extent do you agree or disagree with it 61
- The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, whereas, apart from, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32793522267 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66589276143 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550607287449 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9310050401 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6428571429 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217635423176 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828754048557 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922021429445 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175672896999 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10594386583 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.