The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The line graph illustrates the global water consumption by agriculture, industrial, and domestic sectors, over a 100-year period, whereas the table shows the use of water by the population of Brazil and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Overall, it is apparent that, agriculture is the sector where the highest amount of water is used than the rest of the two given sectors, and the people of Brazil consume more water than the Democratic Republic of Congo.
In 1990, globally the use of water in agriculture was higher than the industrial and domestic sectors, and it was near about 500 Km. The use of water in agriculture increased gradually over next 100 years and reached 5000 km, in 2000. On the other hand, initially the consumption of water in industry and domestic sectors were same, but at the end of the period, water consumption in industrial section surpassed the domestic sector.
The population of Brazil is higher than the Democratic Republic of Congo, and it is 176 million. Similarly, the amount of irrigated land is greater than the Democratic Republic of Congo, that’s why, the water consumption by a single individual in Brazil is about 44% higher than the Democratic republic of Congo.
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. Describe the information in the table and make comparisons where appropriate. 73
- Some say that people living in high-rise apartments are lonely and unhappy, while others say that it’s advantageous to stay in high-rise apartments. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- The graph below shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000 79
- The diagram below shows the percentage of share of total world production of wheat by Asia Europe and other part of the world from the years 1840 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 67
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, similarly, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0495049505 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78608653994 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445544554455 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.4240527929 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.0 112.824112599 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.6666666667 22.9334400587 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259838902569 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141423447438 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760432970376 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176972302832 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663649176459 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 61.2550243902 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.