The line graph and the table illustrates the globally uses of water by different sectors ( Agriculture, Industrial and domestic use) and water consumed by brazil and congo in 2000.
Overall, it is totally clear that more amount of water is consumed by agriculture sector, whereas Brazilians consumption of water is higher than congo people.
In terms of line graph, Agriculture sector started using water under 1000 km in 1900. However, over the period it faced a drastic increasement
and peaked up to over 3000. For instance, industrial and domestic use were steady in the beginning of the period, while from the year 1950 it rose up to 1000 kam and 500 km respectively.
According to the table, 176 million Brazilians irrigated 26,500 km land and consumed 359 m water. Moreover, congo population were half of in comparison to brazil people who irrigated exactly 100km of land, whereas 8m water is consumed by per person which was much lower in comparison to brazil.
- When computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive in providing goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Skeptics claim that the opposite is true as computers have proved disappointing in terms of produc 62
- task 1: the number of marriages and divorces 73
- In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn.Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 78
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bally uses of water by different sectors Agriculture, Industrial and domestic use...
^^
Line 8, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was much lower in comparison to brazil.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02469135802 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72775256387 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1797382567 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.285714286 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215020856815 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105649780376 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929714053277 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13203577827 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900708745316 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.