The line graph illustrate the amount of fish and different kinds of meat ( Chicken, Beef and Lamb) which were consumed by european people from the year 1979 to 2004. Units are measured in grams.
Overall, the consumption of Beef and Lamb decreased over the given period, while chicken, it rose.However, fish kept the lowest position throughout the time. At the start of the period, Beef was the most popular, which was replaced by chicken from 1989 to 2004, and following that lamb and fish were still at the lowest position in the end of the period.
With regards to the amount of Beef used, it begins at around 200 grams in the start of the period and slightly increased up to 240 grams before falling dramatically at about 100 grams in the last year. Likewise, approximately 150 grams of Lamb was eaten in the year 1997 after which the figure fluctuated slightly and dropped to a lowest position that is almost up to 60 grams in 2004. Furthermore, fish was in the decreased position in the starting year which was above 50 grams and by the end of the year it was not increased or decreased but was quite stadely to 50 grams respectively.
On the other hand, the consumption of chicken was 150 grams in the fist year and the european people started consuming it to the highest level. However it peaked up to 250 grams in the end of the period.
- More and more students are studying at universities abroad, either because it is cheaper, or because they feel they can receive a better education, or because it will provide them with greater professional opportunities. Which one do you think is the most 67
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.Cambridge 6 test 1 task 1 78
- PTE essay People pursue dangerous activities like skydiving motorcycle sports white water river rafting etc Do you support If yes why and if not why 43
- In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn.Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ount of fish and different kinds of meat Chicken, Beef and Lamb which were consum...
^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...he given period, while chicken, it rose.However, fish kept the lowest position througho...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...gure fluctuated slightly and dropped to a lowest position that is almost up to 60...
^
Line 5, column 563, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eased or decreased but was quite stadely to 50 grams respectively. On the ot...
^^
Line 5, column 576, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eased but was quite stadely to 50 grams respectively. On the other hand, the...
^^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...rted consuming it to the highest level. However it peaked up to 250 grams in the end of...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, likewise, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1109.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56378600823 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46848413897 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456790123457 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.7453443612 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.222222222 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0849181273987 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455617678004 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669495661276 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806064763714 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744100703881 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.