The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The line graph shows the volume of water, which is measured in cubic kilometers, used all over the world for agriculture, industrial and domestic purposes in the 20th century, while the table illustrates the data of consumption of water in Brazil and the Democratic Republic of Congo in the year 2000.
Overall, a major proportion of water was used in agriculture at any time in the given period, while domestic and industrial been the least consumer of water. In the case of the table, water consumption by Brazil is significantly higher than that of Congo.
Approximately 500 cubic kilometers of water was used in agriculture in 1900, which increased steadily over the time to reach somewhere near 3000 cubic kilometers at the end. Whereas, a negligible volume of water was consumed by industries and domestic needs at the beginning, but the proportion of water used for industries started to rise considerably after 1950 to reach over 1000 cubic kilometer in 2000, unlike the domestic purposes that had only a slight rise to reach a little below 500 km3 in 2000.
Brazil’s population(176 million), the total surface area of irrigated land(26,500 km2) and per capita water consumption(359m3) were more than thirty times higher than that of Congo which had only 5.2 million people with 8 cubic metres of water consumption per head and a mere total of 100km2 irrigated land.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by industries and domestic needs at the beginning, but the proportion of water u...
^^
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilometer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometers'.
Suggestion: kilometers
...bly after 1950 to reach over 1000 cubic kilometer in 2000, unlike the domestic purposes t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02183406114 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88419931196 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524017467249 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.9338080947 43.030603864 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 191.666666667 112.824112599 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.1666666667 22.9334400587 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237853671942 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136499038583 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430835419537 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162129420417 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503737511596 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.3 13.2329268293 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.91 61.2550243902 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.3012195122 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.