The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrate average temperature per month and the table measures total length of time of sunshine in a year. They are in London, New York, and Sydney. Overall, it can be seen that while New York and London temperature rise, Sydney is hitting its lowest.
In January, the temperature in Sydney stood at 25 which is the highest than two other cities. However this number dropped gradually and hit a low of 15 in July. It experienced steady growth in December at 25. New York and London had the lowest temperature in January, they began and ended at a fairly similar level of between 5 and 8. While temperature in New York increased until peaked at 30, London increasing to 24 in July. However both saw sharp decrease in December at 5 and 8.
Next, total hours of sunshine in New York was the longest time which had 2535. Followed by Sydney it got 2473. While London representing 1180 which was the lowest hours of all nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-25 | Nguyen Thi Thanh Xuan | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-25 | Nguyen Thi Thanh Xuan | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-16 | monmon12345 | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | kevann | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | kevann | 73 | view |
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give your 78
- The Two Pie Charts Below Show the Online Shopping Sales for Retail Sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 84
- The Pie Charts Below Show The Comparison of Different Kinds of Energy Production of France in Two Years 78
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050 84
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...h is the highest than two other cities. However this number dropped gradually and hit a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...at 30, London increasing to 24 in July. However both saw sharp decrease in December at...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in July. However both saw sharp decrease in December at 5 and 8. Next, total h...
^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d 2535. Followed by Sydney it got 2473. While London representing 1180 which was the ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59171597633 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4710359562 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579881656805 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3338068144 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.6666666667 112.824112599 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.0833333333 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.16666666667 5.23603664747 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115056748069 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442536563331 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797543327279 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887954015209 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604596649344 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.75 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.