The Two Pie Charts Below Show the Online Shopping Sales for Retail Sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.
The pie charts given below illustrate some online shopping sales for retail sector in Canada in 2005 and 2010. The data is measured in percentage. In overall, it can be seen that the significant increase was food and beverage while the significant decrease was home furnishings.
In 2005, the hugest percentage was electronic & appliance which had more than a third. Difference from home furnishings as the second biggest percentage was a quarter. Followed by food & beverage it got 22%, while video games representing 18% which was the smallest percentage of all online shopping sales.
By 2012, the most popular online shopping sales was food & beverage, this thing grew dramatically over the five years to represent the largest proportion of sales at 32%. Although electronic & appliance was the second most famous sale, but this fell to less than a third. Sale on the video games went up slightly to 23%, but home furnishings reduced significantly to only less than a fifth five years later.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-17 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | fdsugb22 | view | |
| 2023-07-05 | jasmine.27 | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | Maju Chowdhury | 67 | view |
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give your 78
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main export in 2000 20 and future projection for 2025 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The Charts Below Show US Spending Patterns between 1966 and 1996 78
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050 84
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about the consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13496932515 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77026206252 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625766871166 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4881051094 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244129713664 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112984620327 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.214303837644 0.0843802449381 254% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182139479846 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143419516425 0.0819641961636 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.