The graph bellow compares changes in the birth rates of China and USA between 1920 and 2000.
The line graph illustrates the birth rates of China and the USA and how these rates changed from 1920 to 2000.
Overall, during the period, the birth rates in both nations decreased. However, the rate in China was lower than that in the USA in most of the years although they had a similar trend of general decline.
The number of the fertility rate in China varied significantly from 10% to 15% between 1920 and 1935 despite of its trend of increasing. However, this rate dived sharply in the following decade and reached the number of 5%. Then there was a dramatic soar in the fertility rate in China from 1945 and it finished at the highest point of the whole line graph, 20% in 1950. After reaching that peak, this rate declined steadily during the period of 50 years from 1950 with the final number was 2% in 2000.
Over the same period, the USA also saw considerable fluctuations in the fertility. From above 10% in 1920, the number of birth rate increased to 13% in 1935 before plunging suddenly below 5% in 1945. However, there was a quick surge during a half of the following decade which soared to 15%. Between 1950 and 2000, this rate decreased gradually and finished approximately at 7% in 2000.
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The world natural resources are being consumed at an over-increased rate. What are the dangers of this situation? What should we do? 67
- Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking. Therefore, the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the same way as the advertising of cigarettes is banned. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- as well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('quickly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('surge') instead of another adjective.
...ly below 5% in 1945. However, there was a quickly surge during a half of the following decade w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61538461538 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37527248515 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509615384615 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.3215375764 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.2727272727 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45454545455 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372132979787 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150456699825 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133515794079 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287559170285 0.15604864568 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138987701829 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.