The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart makes a comparison between Chinese and the US birth rates over an 80-year period from 1920 to 2000.
A glance at the graph provided reveals striking similarities between the fertility of China and the USA during the time frame. Another interesting point is that whereas the birth rates of both countries were comparable until 1950, the gap between the two widened after this time as fertility in China began to slid away.
Looking at the details, increasing from a-tenth to 15% in 1935, the birth rate of China plunged to only 5%. This figure levelled off until 1945, at which point it experienced an exponential climb to one-fifth before dropping considerably to just under 10% by the year 1955. During the latter half of the century, the fertility of this country witnessed a steady decline.
As regards the USA, the birth rate fluctuated between 11 and 13 percent prior to 1940. This was followed by a rapid fall in the next 5 years, reaching somewhere in the vicinity of 5 percent. The following 5 years saw a marked growth of this figure, peaking at 15% in 1950, after which it underwent a sustained fall.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-11 | thaiha123 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | teulimin.06 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | trucvy112233 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-04 | dhq.testbig | 78 | view |
- Write about the following topic Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your ow 78
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 84
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 78
- The table describes the percentage of employers difficulty in recruiting employees in fourdifferent fields from 2003 to 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, whereas, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74111675127 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51627186683 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61421319797 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4953937856 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.777777778 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198091184371 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829242875066 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810254805177 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130529074613 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740373435251 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.