The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph indicates the comparison of fertility between China and the USA from 1920 to 2000.
Overall, both of the birth rates line graph are tend to be same shape graph. In two countries, it fluctuated dramatically of datas about the fertility ones.
In China, the birth rates increased in 1925 around 12% and had a slightly dip by 2% in 1930. In next 5 years, it is clear to go up at 15%. There was a suddenly drop at 5% from 1940 to 1945. Having a peak in 1950 at 20% with the birth rates. Suddenly, its decreased under 10% in 1955 and dip gradually in the following years to 2000s
In USA, it is obvious to see that the birth rates line graph have same shapes as China. There was a slightly fluctuation from 1920 to 1935 with under 15%. Noticebly, its decreased shaprly at 5% in 1945 and had the highest point at 15% intermately the following year. The fertility of the US dropped continously from 1955 to 2000 around under 15% and 10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-11 | thaiha123 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | teulimin.06 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | trucvy112233 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-04 | dhq.testbig | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 10
- Children should always follow their parents advice To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002
- Some people think that children should start school at a very early age but others believe that should not go to school until they are older Discuss both these views and give your opinion 67
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('dip') instead of another adjective.
...es increased in 1925 around 12% and had a slightly dip by 2% in 1930. In next 5 years, it is c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...% and had a slightly dip by 2% in 1930. In next 5 years, it is clear to go up at 1...
^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('suddenly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('drop') instead of another adjective.
... it is clear to go up at 15%. There was a suddenly drop at 5% from 1940 to 1945. Having a peak ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 99, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fluctuation') instead of another adjective.
...ph have same shapes as China. There was a slightly fluctuation from 1920 to 1935 with under 15%. Notic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 780.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.35754189944 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40077908352 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569832402235 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4374251342 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.9090909091 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2727272727 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.181818181818 5.23603664747 3% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181115068817 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720196997456 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863905262674 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14428796853 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860772867725 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.71 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.