The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words

Essay topics:

The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.

The line graph illustrates the information about the percentage changing of birth between China and the USA from 1920 to 2000.

It is clear to say that; although both of two countries were a downward trend, the rate represented for the USA was higher than China at the ending point in 2000. However, it was impressed by 2000 in China with the rate increase sharply.

Starting with the USA’s line from 1945 back, the propotion of the birth changing was flutuate. However after 1940 the amount of rate was a fall in 1945 with under 5%. In 1950, the rate grow strongly and peak at 15%; higher than 1945 with 10%. From 1950 to 2000, the changes of birth rates decrease rapidly 15% to around 6%.

About the China’s line, it was flutuate from 1920 to 1935 between 10% and 13%. After 1935, the line was drop significatly to 13% to 5% and nothing changed until 1945 and peak at 1950 with the highest rate 20%. Not only the China’s line took the highest rate 20% but also took the dip at 2000 with around 3% when compares with the USA’s line

Votes
Average: 7.2 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-12-11 thaiha123 78 view
2023-08-21 bemoichoianhyeuem 89 view
2023-07-31 teulimin.06 67 view
2023-07-26 trucvy112233 73 view
2023-07-04 dhq.testbig 78 view
Essays by user duchuynh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ward trend, the rate represented for the USA was higher than China at the ending ...
^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as higher than China at the ending point in 2000. However, it was impressed by 2...
^^
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ion of the birth changing was flutuate. However after 1940 the amount of rate was a fal...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47916666667 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.14125218914 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1384007296 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238787539833 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119098318617 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735685762998 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186880604539 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757307578023 0.0819641961636 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.