The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates how the birth rates of China and the USA changed from the year 1920 to the year 2000. It is clear that fertility rates of both nations followed similar trends of change, with a noticeable drop in the 1940s and a peak in the 1950s.
In 1920, the birth rates in China and the USA were approximately 10 percent and 11 percent respectively. China’s rate surged to 15 percent in 1935, the USA’s rate to about 13. Afterward, China experienced a significant drop to about 5 percent in 1940, the USA, likewise, in 1945. Another rapid growth happened in 1950, with China’s rate rocketing to a peak of 20 percent and the USA’s rate soaring to 15 percent. In 1950s, while the USA’s rate started going down gradually, a dramatic decline brought the rate to 9 percent in China in 1955. The downward trend continued. In the year 2000, China’s rate was down to 2 percent and the USA’s was 7 percent.
Before 1955, both countries fluctuated in fertility rates. The USA had a higher rate in the 1920s, the early and the late 1930s, and the early 1940s, while China exceeded the USA by around 2 percent in the year 1935 and by roughly 5 percent in 1950. For nearly 45 years since 1955, nevertheless, the USA surpassed China with a relatively larger discrepancy until the end of the period in the graph.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | Hien16698 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | hanhnguyen180799 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | hanhnguyen180799 | 56 | view |
| 2018-05-25 | Nora Peng | 61 | view |
| 2018-02-22 | Bilegsaikhan | 67 | view |
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 75
- The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the US and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system. 73
- Given are two pie charts displaying the categories of the annual spending divided by families in Canada between 1972 and 2002. 78
- The table below shows the estimated oil capacity of six countries, in millions of barrels per day, from 1990 to 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph beside shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'In the 1950s'.
Suggestion: In the 1950s
... USA's rate soaring to 15 percent. In 1950s, while the USA's rate started goin...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, nevertheless, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68487394958 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71167304077 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495798319328 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9413446242 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9166666667 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.08333333333 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214588696368 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994499800676 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742027521455 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164002102847 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412833074472 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.