The line graph provides information on the number of visits to two different latest music sites on the website.
It can be seen from the graph that pop parade had the highest number of visits at 120000, whereas music choice was only 40000 on day one. Between day two and nine, the number of visits on pop parade declined significantly from around 180000 to 40000 respectively. However, the figure for pop parade rose suddenly from 40000 on day 9 to a peak of 150000 on day 11, before decline dramatically to 90000 on day thirteen. But at the same time, after two days, the figure noticed a considerable growth from 90000 to a massive 160000.
In contrast, visitors to music choice noticed much less famous than pop parade throughout given the period. Among this, the data for music choice fluctuated from day two to day eleven, except on day third when they reached a moderate 60000 visits. Interestingly, between on day 11 and day 15, the number of visits on music choice grew quickly, reaching 120000 on day 12, and then they declined slightly on day 13, before being a tiny growth on day 14. Neverthless, by day 15, the trend had plunged remarkably.
Overall, It is clear from the graph that the number of visitors of pop parade showed an increasing trend, while music choice recorded decreasing pattern within given period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In contrast, visitors to music choice noticed much less famous than pop parade...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, then, third, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76293103448 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50486669587 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525862068966 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9610326519 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13956351301 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768617036446 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776791270628 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132258106901 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913378255905 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.