The graph below depicts the information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by regions
The graph illustrates data report of global population and distribution of wealth which are divided by six categories, specifically North America, China, other Asia Pacific, India, Europe, Africa, Latin America and Caribean, and also rich Asia Pacific. It is measured by percentage terms. Overall, what stands out from the graph is that North America, Europe, rich Asia Pacific have a relatively resemblance in the top of global wealth percentage, while population showed a reverse. Meanwhile, five regions have higher population number than wealth, as like as China, other Asia Pacific, India, Africa, Latin America and Caribean.
Taking this data of global population, China has top number data which is accounted for almost 25. Other Asia Pacific and India are the second on list, with over 15. Another interesting point is that Europe at the third on data, shows slightly less at 15. The lowest data of global population based on 8 regions is Rich Asia Pacific, at comprised of 5.
On the other hand, North America is the highest number data of Wealth’s Distribution, which was almost 35. On the contrary, Africa and India have only under 5.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-19 | citra orwela | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-19 | citra orwela | view | |
| 2022-01-19 | citra orwela | view |
- Life skills should be taught to teenagers at school together with traditional subjects such as math and science Do you agree 33
- The bar graphs show Chinese investment in Europe
- The graph below depicts the numbers of male and female research students studying six computer science subjects at a US university in 2011 89
- Life skills should be taught to teenagers at school together with traditional subjects such as math and science Do you agree 56
- Life skills should be taught to teenagers at school together with traditional subjects such as math and science Do you agree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 384, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('relatively') instead an adjective, or a noun ('resemblance') instead of another adjective.
...America, Europe, rich Asia Pacific have a relatively resemblance in the top of global wealth percentage,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th over 15. Another interesting point is that Europe at the third on data, shows ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, third, while, as to, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14893617021 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61163171028 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563829787234 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 63.2092556514 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182534431523 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758588903574 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630045892924 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110067842527 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754587155279 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.