The graph below describes the changes in medical funding in four countries from 2010 to 2018.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart compares how medical funding was changed in four different countries at eight-year intervals between 2010 and 2018.
It is clearly observed from graph that the largest amount of money was spend on medication in countries D and A in the year 2010. On the other hand, in 2018, country D accounted for the smallest figure for medical funding among other countries.
In 2010, country A saw a dramatic growth at 32 million of dollars, while there was a sharp drop in counties B and C at nearly 24 and well over 12 million of dollars, respectively. The figure for country C reached the least popularity at 20 million of dollars in 2014, whereas it picked at just under 28M dollars in countries A and D. In addition. The number of country D decreased sharply from 32 to 16 million of dollars over the entire period. It is also noting that the figure for country B remained same at approximately 24 million of dollars.
- The graph below describes the changes in medical funding in four countries from 2010 to 2018 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- These days it is much easier for many people to travel to different countries for tourism than in the past Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- People who start a university course but do not complete it should be fined Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 words 78
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below describes the changes in medical funding in four countries from 2010 to 2018 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 47
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...ph that the largest amount of money was spend on medication in countries D and A in t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, whereas, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 772.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62275449102 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64358881042 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568862275449 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.409690529 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.285714286 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186627602218 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877847518216 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710805891843 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162309927196 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662321184316 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.