The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections untill 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The information about the utilization of energy in the USA from 1980 to 2030 with the prediction from a 2008 report is depicted by the rendered line chart. The data has been calibrated in quadrillion units.

To begin with, 35 quadrillion units of power used by petrol and oil in 1980. There was a fluctuating increase noticed in the usage of power until 2005, which was increased by 5 in 2005. However, after that, the utilization of energy inclined dramatically and also this trend will continue in the future until 2030. Moreover, 20 and 15 Quadrillion units of energy were seen in 1980 by Natural gas and coal respectively. Although there had been fluctuated increase noticed in the usage of energy by coal and natural gas in 2010, it accounted for 22 and 23 correspondingly, then the use of coal rose rapidly with the projection of 2030, it will be increased by 8. However, the utilization of energy by natural gas will be similar in the estimated 2030 in comparison to the past.

Moving towards, in 1980, 3 quadrillion units of energy consumed by nuclear, solar and hydropower. Despite the utilize of energy by nuclear and solar increased steadily until 2005, a drastic increase will be seen in the usage of energy by these two fuels with projections until 2030, it will be comprised for 6 and 5 respectively. In addition, there was a fluctuating decrease observed in the usage of energy by hydropower, it will be decreased by 1, which will be accounted for 3.

To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that the highest energy utilization was seen by petrol and oil throughout the span and it will continue in the future. However, the lowest energy consumption was observed by hydropower.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... nuclear, solar and hydropower. Despite the utilize of energy by nuclear and solar increase...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, then, in addition, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 33.7804878049 186% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 965.302439024 146% => OK
No of words: 294.0 196.424390244 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78911564626 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87930343384 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448979591837 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 283.868780488 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.672117037 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.307692308 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194730593387 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806541844916 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933756277859 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148809160137 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105124620856 0.0819641961636 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.