The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030

The graph illustrates US energy consumption by different fuels since 1980 and prediction until 2030from 2008 report.

Overall, it can be seen that petrol and oil significantly dominated throughout the given time period and predicted to achieve all time high level. Also, trend for the all other fuels increased and remain upeard in future except hydropower.

With regards to petrol and oil, in 1980, consumption of energy stood at 35 quad units and it is followed by natural gas and coal at 20 and 16 quad units respectively. Petrol and oil source fluctuated until 1995 but then, it increased rapidly and reached at 45 in 2020 and is predicted to growth remains in upward trend which would touch all time high figure at 50 quad units. Consumption of energy through coal increased moderately and reached at 27 in 2020 and uprise momentum is forecasted until 2030. While for natural gas, it rised slightly with fluctuation in between and it is assumed to remain constant in future at 25 quad units.

Nuclear, solar, wind and hydropower were at the lowest level of 3 quad units in 1980. For nuclear, solar and wind, it augmented slowly until 2020 and it is anticipated to stand at 8 and 7 quad units respectively in 2030. While hydropower fluctuated until 2010 and after that it is assumed to reach at previous figure of 5 quad units.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 6.8 294% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80519480519 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63914510044 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532467532468 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.092374514 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159462878814 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795298339048 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10099009122 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132751797344 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133508290284 0.0819641961636 163% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.