The line graph shows U.S. Energy utilization and sources in 6 major categories from 1980 to 2030. The units are given in quadrillion units. Overall, Fossil Fuels dominate and surpass other sources, and have an increasing trend as a projection.
At first glance it can be seen that, Petrol and oil is the main energy source throughout the timescale. It started from 35 quadrillion units (qu.) which is almost the sum of all other sources in year 1980, had a fluctuating trend for 20 years, but increased steadily after year 2000 until 2030 and ended up with 50 qu. Similarly Coal and Natural Gas had also increasing trend although, coal keeps the trend upward and reaches 32 quadrillion units in 2030, projection shows that natural gas reaches its plateau in year 2015 with 25 qu. and keeps at this level for the next 15 years.
On the contrary, nuclear energy and alternative clean sources, like solar/wind and hydro-power are not used commonly, all started from 3 qu. in 1980, and their use fluctuated in a band between 4-9 qu. throughout the timescale. Unfortunately, projections shows that use of green energy will not increase in future noticeably.
- Counties such as China, India and Japan have unsustainable population growths. In fact many experts are of the opinion that the population ‘explosion’ which is now a very worrying concern, is the most serious threat to life on this planet.Give some su 89
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 78
- It is better to eat food which is produced locally by small farmers, rather than food produced by ‘factory farming’ and transported long distances.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 51
- Comparison of car theft 84
- Task2:Today more people are travelling than ever before.Why is this the case?What are the benefits of travelling for the traveler? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e an increasing trend as a projection. At first glance it can be seen that, Pet...
^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...000 until 2030 and ended up with 50 qu. Similarly Coal and Natural Gas had also increasin...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, similarly, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91326530612 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69474224681 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632653061224 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4333308278 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.25 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163001246613 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562693544375 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615702326419 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114886488582 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142063439495 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.