If we want our children to live healthy, and happily, giving our children a sustainable world should not only government’s responsibility, but also our duty.
First of all, the worlds resources are scare, they are not endless. Many developed countries used fossil fuels for energy, which is cheap, easy to utilize, and transport. But on the other hand, those resources has a limit. Although we can burn and consume fuel oil, coal etc., we can not reproduce those resources. Since this model of development is not sustainable, this leads leads us to the question: "When will those sources come to a grinding halt ? moreover, what will happen next? So to prevent any chaos, governments should encourage companies to invest in alternative energy resources.
In Addition, producing energy with conventional methods, contains burning of the resource at some point of the process, which causes considerable amount of toxic waste that leads to pollution. This pollution in turn threatens the ecology of the world. To prevent this, not only the government, but also the whole community should be well educated to decrease energy consumption and to choose products which are more energy efficient and producing less waste, an example could be promoting use of bikes or electrical car for daily routine.
On the other hand, green energy should be planned carefully too. In my country, where lots of rivers found, hydroelectric dams were built carelessly without planning its effect to ecology, they soon became inefficient due to erosion of earth, and also damages local fauna. Another example is the wind power plants, which were built on migration routes of birds, puts those birds to under risk of extinction.
To sum up, I agree with the idea that, green energy is the solution of our energy problems and helps us to regain earth’s ecological balance, but this also should be tailored according to countries geographic, and biologic position.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: leads
...of development is not sustainable, this leads leads us to the question: 'When will tho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 'When will those sources come to a grinding halt ? moreover, what will happ...
^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...hose sources come to a grinding halt ? moreover, what will happen next? So to prevent a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, well, in addition, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2380952381 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8067747144 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638095238095 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.384769539078 780% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 0.809619238477 988% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.5906023915 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144626400844 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422511796918 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373359830233 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0715655683287 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03479128154 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.