The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The following graph shows the details of the energy consumption in the USA, involved projections from 1980 till 2030. It is clear to find out that all the energy sources have been increased over this period.
Take a look at the diagrams, the fuel of Petrol and Oil stood in the top consumption among the other five data. It has been raised from 35 to nearly 50 quadrillion units from 1980 to 2030. Following by the Coal and Natural Gas, which own a similar statistics. In 1980, these two fuels only have a gap of 4 quadrillion units (Coal for 16 and Natural Gas for 20 quadrillion units), after the 50 years projections, two resources have opposite positions, although both of them have gone up, in 2030 the Coal will have almost 5 quadrillion units higher than the Natural Gas. In addition, the data of Natural Gas keep the same in 24 quadrillion units since 2015.
Moreover, three sections share the same number in the begin of the graphs--Nuclear, Solar/Wind, and the Hydropower resource. The steady boost of these dates have reached a separate number after the year 2030, and three of these data have newly 2 quadrillion units difference between. (Nuclear for 7, Solar/Wind for 5 and Hydropower for 3 quadrillion units)
- The two maps below showed road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010. 73
- The international community must act immediately to ensure that all countries reduce their consumption of fossil fuels, such as gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 78
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because it will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?Give reasons for your answer and include any 67
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...three sections share the same number in the begin of the graphs--Nuclear, Solar/Wind, and...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'Hydropower' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hydropowers'.
Suggestion: Hydropowers
...en. Nuclear for 7, Solar/Wind for 5 and Hydropower for 3 quadrillion units
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, so, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73708920188 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71934349951 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577464788732 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.5022962572 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.9 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0983981578207 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522677713272 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071202365523 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877022066845 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666771807677 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.