The line graph analyses the usage patterns of different forms (six types) of energy from 1980 to projectile consumption of energy till 2030 in the United States of America from a report back in 2008. The consumption units are measured in quadrillions.
Overall, there is slight increase in all the forms of energy consumed or future consumption except for Hydro power.
We could also infer from the graph that as there is a substantial increase in consumption patterns in combination of petrol and oil and in coal, these two would stand as the major sources of energy in the near future.
According to the line graph, although Petrol and Oil have a lot of fluctuations in the consumption pattern from 35 million quadrillion to 34 quadrillion in 1995, since then there is a steady rise in consumption till 2030 and is predicted to have a consumption of about 43 quadrillion. Coal's consumption has steadily risen from 16 quadrillion and is almost projected to reach the double of initial consumption to about 31 quadrillion units.
As for Natural gas, there isn't a drastic consumption change compared to the above mentioned energy sources change predicted but only a change of about 2 quadrillion form 30 to 32. As for Nuclear, Solar/Wind, Hydro power all the consumption pattern starts at around 4 quadrillion but nuclear energy has a slight increase in demand to 5 quadrillion. Solar/Wind have only an increase of 0.5 consumption predicted with Hydro power taking a dip in consumption in the future.
- he chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport. 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 67
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 27, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ion units. As for Natural gas, there isnt a drastic consumption change compared t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, as for, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9672245902 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 374.4 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.9302965369 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28561909273 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124391081862 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747142088924 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15942205961 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799049252436 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.