The graph below gives information about international migration to the UK, 1999 -2008
The chart compares the differences between the rates of immigration, emigration and net migration in Britain in a 9-year-period between 1999 and 2008.
Overall, it is clear that both immigration and emigration rates witnessed a general increase; whereas the figure for the former was significantly higher than the latter. Meanwhile, the net migration rate fluctuated sharply during the time shown. Units are measured in thousands of people.
In 1999, the number of people came and lived in the UK was at around 450 thousand people, 150 thousand people more than the number of citizens leaving the country. During the next 5 years, the former witnessed an increase of about 250 thousand people; while the latter just saw a rise of about 50 thousand people. The net migration rate stood at about 180 thousand people, then it remained so until peaking at nearly 250 thousand people in 2004.
The figure for immigration was highest at 600 thousand people in 2006 before falling slightly to just approximately 590 thousand people in the end. It was followed by the number of people who emigrated at 400 thousand people in 2006, then decreasing sharply to around 320 thousand people in 2007 before surging to over 410 in 2008. The figure for net migration then dropped to around 180 thousand people in 2008 despite a high peak of approximately 210 thousand people in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-19 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- The line graph shows the cost for watching films The pie charts show the change in the percentage of market share represented by the three forms 89
- The charts show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 85
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011. 73
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding 64
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational settings in the UK in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roximately 210 thousand people in 2007.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1149.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01746724891 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67248908297 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510917030568 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4395945926 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.9 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100823265787 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492950387107 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401794367391 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749940103998 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421379967349 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.