The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world
The provided line graph illustrates detailed information about overseas tourist destinations in various places in the world.
From first glance, while the majority of visitors who landed in North America, the least figures for travelers belonged to those moving to Sub-Saharan Africa and South-America in 1990.
On average, it is noticeable that there was the largest change in the number of people who arrived in central and Eastern Europe, at approximately 60 million in 2005. By contrast, South America contributed the smallest increases by just over 5 million tourists throughout this period. In addition, about 30 million international tourists who went to South-East Asia, more than three-fold as many as in central and Eastern Europe.
Looking at the line graph in more detail, after the substantial upward trend of two times, central and Eastern Europe had an equal trend in comparison with North America, at roughly 90 million visitors from abroad. Besides, despite having the same data in the beginning, the number of travelers going to Sub-Saharan Africa was just under 5 million as high as in South America in the next 15 years. Due to the double rise between 1990 and 2005, South America still stood at the third-ranking among five distinct parts of the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-08 | hien3112 | 75 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-05 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | hunghoang | 84 | view |
- the graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world 78
- The chart shows the information about salt intake in the US in 2000 50
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 67
- The chart and table below give information about healthcare resources and life expectancy in different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, look, so, still, third, while, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17874396135 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75131694252 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618357487923 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9391511315 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145888068256 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714775611419 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824979683677 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106416567035 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.099985324504 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.