The internet is viewed as an excellent means of communication but some people suggest that it may not the best place to find information
Recently, the means of finding out detailed information as well as making conversations has become an ongoing topic of debate in many parts of the world. It is a common belief that the Internet plays an indispensable role in the process of bonding people, which cannot be supplanted by any other kind. Nevertheless, there are some shortcomings when the Internet is used to find out detailed information. I incline to both arguments for several reasons.
On the one hand, in the Internet age, using wireless networks not only can contribute a decline to the distance barrier by some social media, but also broaden one’s social circle, even making overseas new friends. Specifically, in terms of extroverted teenagers, they can feel more at ease when having more friends, eventually from abroad. For example, there is no need to set aside time to organize face-to-face meetings, they just add friends on social media, such as Facebook or Instagram and create conversations. According to the Close-knit Bonds Club, the majority of adolescents tend to deem the visual world as the basic needs to exchange their stories, some projects at schools and catch up on gossips with friends
On the other hand, it is argued that lucid ways to look for detail on the Internet can seem as key considerations in the competitive world. The exactitude from experienced generations outweighs on the Internet. It fosters following the truth and the greatest solutions when facing real experiences on a daily basis which are related to professional knowledge. In fact, it cannot be denied that the Internet is the no-end information source, whereas the fake and true are mixed. According to the Oxford survey, approximately 87% of citizens tend to place more importance on asking for their parents than on the Internet. As a result, they can further their career paths and achieve the coveted awards in late life.
To sum up, while it is apparent that the Internet is one way by which users can making new friends without setting aside time for meetings, it is undeniable that it cannot act as a key role in finding detail. I suggest that people should not overuse and pay much reliance on the Internet.
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue 84
- The chart and table below give information about healthcare resources and life expectancy in different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 75
- Some people feel that certain workers like nurses doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the work that t 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to both arguments for several reasons. On the one hand, in the Internet age, us...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and catch up on gossips with friends On the other hand, it is argued that luc...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ieve the coveted awards in late life. To sum up, while it is apparent that the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, nevertheless, so, well, whereas, while, for example, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96730245232 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80079303763 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574931880109 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.3710180831 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.533333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4666666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176735960408 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060011063216 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556934821376 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11218501286 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545056548575 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.