The graph below gives information about the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992
The line graph provides data about the number of cases of indigestion in Mashhad, which were seen over the 9 years from 1983 to 1992.
Overall, we can see people who are sufferred from diarrhea almost the same amount for 5 years. However, the rest of the years are sharp fluction until 1992.
With regard to the amount of people affected by this disease, it begin at around 100 people and increased slightly until 1985. Likewise, these insignificant changes, came to 1987, the number of sick people were 200, however within a year the early figures returned. It is apparent from the information supplied in 1990 the quantity of patients peaked and their were average 400 people. Luckily, no one patient have been discovered the final year.
Although diarrhea started with the least annual growth, accelerated the most overall and in 1989 the digit of people rose by only about 300 people. In spite of this, in 1992 there were no sick people with this disorder.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-27 | Yeonny | view | |
| 2023-02-17 | trongkhoile8 | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-27 | Farhod2004 | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-27 | Farhod2004 | 11 | view |
| 2022-01-27 | Farhod2004 | 11 | view |
- The table below shows social economics indicators for four countries in 1994 according to United Nations statistics 78
- The graph below gives information about the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992 84
- The chart below shows changes in three different areas of crime in manchester city centre from 2003 to 2012 61
- To a certain extent I agree that we do not need to watch live entertainment performances since we can watch online However I also think that watching live gives us other pleasures There are several reasons why I believe that browsing online is useful Firs 56
- More people are shopping online today than ever before Why do people choose to shop this way Are there any disadvantages to shopping online 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... and their performance is satisfactory. However Peru and Angola lag far behind these co...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, such as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07446808511 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49038440531 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643617021277 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1671171148 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0180092961338 0.215688989381 8% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00614134120929 0.103423049105 6% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0123238472875 0.0843802449381 15% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0120772755317 0.15604864568 8% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135868945118 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... and their performance is satisfactory. However Peru and Angola lag far behind these co...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, such as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07446808511 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49038440531 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643617021277 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1671171148 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0180092961338 0.215688989381 8% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00614134120929 0.103423049105 6% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0123238472875 0.0843802449381 15% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0120772755317 0.15604864568 8% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135868945118 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.