The graph below gives information about the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992

Essay topics:

The graph below gives information about the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992.

The line graph provides data about the number of cases of indigestion in Mashhad, which were seen over the 9 years from 1983 to 1992.

Overall, we can see people who are sufferred from diarrhea almost the same amount for 5 years. However, the rest of the years are sharp fluction until 1992.

With regard to the amount of people affected by this disease, it begin at around 100 people and increased slightly until 1985. Likewise, these insignificant changes, came to 1987, the number of sick people were 200, however within a year the early figures returned. It is apparent from the information supplied in 1990 the quantity of patients peaked and their were average 400 people. Luckily, no one patient have been discovered the final year.

Although diarrhea started with the least annual growth, accelerated the most overall and in 1989 the digit of people rose by only about 300 people. In spite of this, in 1992 there were no sick people with this disorder.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-27 Yeonny view
2023-02-17 trongkhoile8 70 view
2022-01-27 Farhod2004 84 view
2022-01-27 Farhod2004 11 view
2022-01-27 Farhod2004 11 view
Essays by user Farhod2004 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... to 1992. Overall, we can see people who are sufferred from diarrhea almost the same...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'begins'?
Suggestion: begins
... of people affected by this disease, it begin at around 100 people and increased slig...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, so, in spite of, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 804.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84337349398 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31717163076 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668674698795 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5067894143 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3333333333 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180446506615 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694950541105 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946747893389 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129325756829 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116650927609 0.0819641961636 142% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.