The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The given line chart illustrates the changes in urban residents in four distinct Asian nations over the 70-year interval starting in 1970, plus predictions for 2030 and 2040.
Overall, it is evident that the population has markedly been increased in all countries, including Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia. Malaysia has been far crowded than others; however, Thailand has been predicted to have the less inhabitants in urban areas.
To begin with, Malaysia and Philippines had the roughly same percentage in 1970, accounting for 30 percent, compared with the lower percentage in Thailand and Indonesia, which laid from 10 to 20 percent. Moreover, Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand rates have gone up all time. While Indonesia saw a significant growth in overall, started with approximately 13 percent but ended up in 2020 at 50 percent. It is also predicted continuously to grow at 60, which will be the second highest rate in 2040. In contrast to Indonesia, the Philippines saw a slight decline from 1990 to 2010 period, decreased from 50 to 45 percent and the rate is expected to reach approximately 52 percent.
In a nutshell, the crowded trends in distinct countries have significantly increased, especially in Malaysia and Indonesia. On the contrary, the Philippines had a slight decline trend, which was the only decreased period in all time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- In many societies foraging has been a leisure activity enjoyed by some individuals Foraging involves searching and gathering wild food resources such as fruits nuts mushrooms and edible plants Proponents argue that foraging is not only a recreational purs 89
- Failure is a proof that the desire wasn t strong enough To what extent do you agree 56
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles What are the changes which have occurred Do you think these changes are positive or negative 11
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making compar 84
- The graph below shows the average closing prices of selected precious metals from 2013 to 2021 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun inhabitants is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...Thailand has been predicted to have the less inhabitants in urban areas. To begi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, second, so, while, in contrast, in contrast to, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1156.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30275229358 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97666484931 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573394495413 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7143384291 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.6 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 5.23603664747 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140195240654 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530684963967 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547748299512 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806819831487 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584933538895 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.