The graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main consumers from 2009 to 2030
The line graph compares four different consumers in terms of using oil between 2009 and 2030, measured in millions barrels per day.
Overall, it is clear that the amount of oil consumed by the US and Western Europe and Japan is predicted to decrease over the period shown. Otherwise, the figures for China and the Middle East are expected to increase.
From 2009 to 2015, the US consumed around 10 million barrels per day. However, the amount of daily oil consumption decreased to over 9 million barrels and are predicted to steadily fall to slightly over 4 million barrels. Western Europe and Japan also witness a reduction of using oil from below 4 million barrels per day in 2009 to over 2 million barrels in 2030.
In contrast, two other consumers see an increase in consuming oil over the period of 31 years. From the similar figure of slightly under 2 million barrels per day in 2009, the amount of daily oil used by China and the Middle East is expected to over 3 million barrels and around 3 million barrels respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-08 | Guri473812 | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-20 | vonhuquynh | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | dinhthu05 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-26 | shubham0708 | 78 | view |
- The scientist believes that computers will become more intelligent than human beings. Some people find it is a positive while others think it is a negative development. Discuss both points and give your own opinion. 89
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufactures to produce vehicles at their US factories 67
- The charts below give information about the people use public library and the main reasons to visit in Britain in 1991 in 2000 49
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles Why are these changes happening Do you think these changes are positive and negative 89
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles Why are these changes happening Do you think these changes are positive and negative 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...around 3 million barrels respectively.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73076923077 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4514917126 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478021978022 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0991425654 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219566674185 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119417439893 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805108869726 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162445786932 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684771258851 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.