The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030.
The graph illustrates the changes of energy consumption in the US from 1980 and gives forecast to 2030 according to a 2008 report.
It is noticeable that the energy consumption of the USA increased during the given period. While the figure for petrol and oil energy increased significantly, there was little change in that of hydropower.
In 1980, while levels of spending on petrol and oil energy stood at 35 quadrillion units, the consumption of natural stood at 20 quadrillion units. By contrast, about 16 quadrillion units energy were coal and only about 7 quadrillion units energy were remaining groups(Nuclear, Solar/Wind and Hydropower).
It is predicted that the petrol and oil energy will be consumed the highest level nearly 50 quadrillion units. While the consumption of coal will reach from 20 to 30 quadrillion units, that of Nuclear, Solar/Wind and Hydropower grow slightly and would reach to over 5 quadrillion units.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | Kien Vu | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | Jass Rai | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Sakil | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | mohammad.iraf | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | mohammad.iraf | 78 | view |
- The map show significant developments that took place at a village park during a 10 year period 35
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 61
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 61
- In some countries a high proportion of criminal acts are committed by teenagers Why has this happened What are some effects 85
- Nowadays more and more older people who need employment compete with the younger people for the same jobs What problems this causes What are solutions 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...rast, about 16 quadrillion units energy were coal and only about 7 quadrillion units...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 783.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18543046358 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02396027996 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53642384106 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1969386032 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.857142857 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251597918385 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137829051188 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1030363223 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185973636125 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108901365807 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.