The graph below gives information on the differences in clothing exports from three different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line graph compares Japan, Colombia and Myanmar in terms of their clothing exports value over a 4-year period, starting from 1999.
Overall, it is evident that while Colombia and Myanmar registered an increase in their clothing exports rates, the opposite was true for Japan. It is also patently obvious that the trend for Myanmar exports was extremely volatile, compared to slight fluctuations in the rate of Japan and Colombia.
Japan was the largest clothing exporter in 1999, with around 580 million dollars, roughly 100 million higher than Colombia. By contrast, clothing exports in Myanmar was non-existent. However, just a year after, Myanmar saw an exponential surge in clothing exports, reaching 800 million dollars in 2000, far exceeding other countries. Meanwhile, Colombia and Japan showed inverse trends, with the former increasing and the latter decreasing to export clothing of roughly 530 million dollars worth in 2000.
From then on, Myanmar continued its rising trend, peaking at nearly 950 million dollars before plummeting and recovering slightly to 450 million dollars in the last year. Unlike Myanmar, clothing exports of Columbia kept rising, overtaking Japan in 2000 and reaching 700 million in 2002. Despite dipping slightly in the last year to 600 million dollars, Colombia still accounted for the largest amount of clothing exports. Figures for Japan, in the meantime, fell gradually to 500 million in 2003, despite a small growth during 2000-2001.
- The graph below gives information on the differences in clothing exports from three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 89
- The map below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 73
- proportion of population aged 65 and over in Japan Sweden and USA
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41991341991 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52017960876 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588744588745 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9487164973 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.818181818 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0817982056112 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425727844318 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0260200253009 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0639000787555 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220206789987 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.