The graph shows the percentage of female members of Parliament in European countries between 2000 and 2012.
The line graph compares the proportion of female Parliamentarians in a selection of European countries from 2000 to 2012.
Overall, it is readily apparent that the percentage of female members in the Parliament of 5 countries all witnessed an increase over the timeframe, with the most prominent rise seen in the figures of British MPs.
British Parliament saw the most dramatic growth in the figures of female representation, with figures climbing by roughly one-fifths to 23% in 2012, despite starting at a relatively low position of nearly 3%. The proportion of Belgian female MPs in the last year also matched that of their British counterparts, although it saw relatively small change from its initial figure of under one-sixths in 2000 and even declined slightly during 2008-2012.
Germany saw the highest number of female members in the Parliament, at around 35% in 2000, which was followed by Italy at over a quarter. After 12 years, Germany experienced a slight increase by 2%, to 37%. Italy also followed the same trend but at a faster rate, finishing at nearly 40%, the highest of all the countries surveyed. The same rising trend was also observed in France's percentage, with figures rising steadily from exactly a quarter in 2000 to about a third in the last year.
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 73
- The graph below shows the number of inquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 84
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 73
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01408450704 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84741687277 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553990610329 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 109.581951441 43.030603864 255% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 152.571428571 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27128956167 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124158864956 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1144747587 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196085403085 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983134283938 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.