The graph below show how much money in a city council gave to book clubs over a four - year period
The line graph demonstrates the expenditure on books donated to the book club by a city council over the given time period.
Overall, the line graph referring to the amount of money spent on books had an upward trend from year 1 to the end of year 3, while in the period from year 3 to year 4 witnessed a downward trend. In addition, the number of books funded to the club registered a fluctuation quantity.
It is clear that money poured to the book's donation recorded a steady upturn in the time between year 1 and year 2, at 20.000 and 21.000 pounds, respectively. However, the amount of money given to books skyrocketed, from 21.000 pounds by year 2 to 40.000 pounds by year 3. In contrast, the city council was paying less expenditure on books for the clubs. Between year 3 and 4, money spent on books was seen a plummet from 40.000 pounds in year 3 to around 35.000 pounds in year 4.
On the other hand, the city council donated a large number of books throughout the period. There was a gradual alleviate in the number of books from year 1 to year 2, at 6000 books and 5000 books, respectively. However, year 3 was registered a surge of the number of books funded, from 5000 books at the end of year 2 to 10000 books in year 3. Furthermore, the number of books given for the book clubs witnessed a considerable increase between year 3 and 4. Additionally, 13000 books are donated to the book clubs by the city council, by year 4.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-12 | rslmsayu | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | phuongnguyen1234 | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-18 | rehamm | 76 | view |
| 2014-02-05 | Diena Fitriya H | 66 | view |
- Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledg 56
- Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students Do you think its advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The internet is probably the most significant invention of the last 30 years Without it our lives would be completely different To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In many parts of the world children and teenagers are spending more and more of their time indoors What do you think are the causes of this problem What measures could best be taken to solve it 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'books'' or 'book's'?
Suggestion: books'; book's
... It is clear that money poured to the books donation recorded a steady upturn in th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 436, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ks was seen a plummet from 40.000 pounds in year 3 to around 35.000 pounds in yea...
^^
Line 7, column 45, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...he other hand, the city council donated a large number of books throughout the period. There was ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, while, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1180.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 268.0 196.424390244 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.40298507463 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55464885774 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.388059701493 0.547539520022 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6213491525 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356244926024 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18503142088 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759256509837 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271087155592 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612633231869 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.54 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.79 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'books'' or 'book's'?
Suggestion: books'; book's
... It is clear that money poured to the books donation recorded a steady upturn in th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 436, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ks was seen a plummet from 40.000 pounds in year 3 to around 35.000 pounds in yea...
^^
Line 7, column 45, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...he other hand, the city council donated a large number of books throughout the period. There was ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, while, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1180.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 268.0 196.424390244 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.40298507463 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55464885774 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.388059701493 0.547539520022 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6213491525 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356244926024 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18503142088 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759256509837 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271087155592 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612633231869 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.54 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.79 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.