The graph below shows how much money a city council gave to book clubs over a four-year period. summarise the information by selecting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given illustration summarises the council donations to book clubs and the number of book club members over an interval of four years.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that both categories experienced an upward trend. Another notable point is that in the year 3, two aspects mentioned shared the same direction.
An in-depth look in the graph shows that in year 1, the amount of money given to book clubs was over 20000 pound. From year 1 to year 2, a slight increase of 2500 pound was seen in this category. Meanwhile, an opposite direction was seen in the total number of book club members, from 6000 to 5000 members. In the year 3, the council contribution rose dramatically to roughly 40000 pound. However, a significant decrease of 5000 pound was reported in year 4.
As for the book club members, after going up sharply to approximately 10000 members in year 3, the figure for this category still underwent a substantial rise to about 12000 members in year 4.
- The table and bar chart show how journey times in a city centre changed after improvements were made to the transport network and the costs of using different forms of transport in the city Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fea 67
- The media pay too much attention to the lives and relationships of celebrities such as actors singers or footballers They should spend more time reporting the lives of ordinary people instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people say that living in a high rise apartment block is a lonely experience because there is no community spirit Others say that people who live in high rise apartments have a much better sense of community than those who live in houses Discuss both 80
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...oney given to book clubs was over 20000 pound. From year 1 to year 2, a slight increa...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
... 1 to year 2, a slight increase of 2500 pound was seen in this category. Meanwhile, a...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...tion rose dramatically to roughly 40000 pound. However, a significant decrease of 500...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...However, a significant decrease of 5000 pound was reported in year 4. As for the boo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, still, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71511627907 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6030089819 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563953488372 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5656235746 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1111111111 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216530551876 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939601668069 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762030662333 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131203757934 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731839413011 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.