Many people believe that formal pen and paper examinations are not the best method of assessing educational achievement What is your view of examination

Some people argue that formal ‘pen and paper’ examinations are not the best way to measure what students have learnt from school. I completely agree with this opinion and I believe different types of knowledge and skills should be measured in according ways.

Examinations are an appropriate method of measuring some sorts of abilities. Students who do well in math examinations usually have a good command of arithmetics and logic. And Memory can be tested by some detailed questions in exams. However, the range of questions in ‘pen and paper’ exams is limited so students can prepare for them by practicing and memorizing in advance. As a result, scores sometimes just reflects how well they have prepared in advance instead of how much they have digested. Quite a few students just focus on skills to pass exams but did not actually work hard to think about the question in the exams.

On the other hand, there are some knowledge and skills that can not be measured by exams. Some people express their ideas better verbally than in writing. They may have good performances in public speaking but still get poor grades in language exams. What’s more, some people show great creativity and practical ability in abundant activities while it is difficult to test these abilities through exams in merely several hours. Standards for these skills are obscure, making it difficult to measure them by exams. These types of abilities should be evaluated in long terms and in more flexible ways.

In conclusion, various competence should be evaluated in appropriate ways to assess educational achievement. Exams work well in measuring some specific types of intelligence but are not suitable for all.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, may, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12857142857 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6714572191 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564285714286 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5181810565 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.75 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149641153142 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501866758819 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798599092669 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103912857742 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799139210529 0.056905535591 140% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.