The graph below shows the amount of UK investments in clean energy from 2008 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the amount of UK investments in clean energy from 2008 to 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph illustrates, the ratio of UK investment in Solar, wind, energy smart technologies and others clean energy in 8 years, from 2008 to 2015.
Overall, as shown in bar chart, the ratio of investment in different alternatives energy power was in increasing trend, while, lowest investment was done in 2008 and highest was in 2015.
To begin with, as the chart represent, in 2008, roughly 2.5 billion pound investment was made by UK, as this is the significant portion among the investment. However, in next year investment increase rapidly and reached nearly 7 billion pound. But in 2010, investment ratio decrease by significant portion, by just 1% and remain constant in 2011 with the ratio of 6 billion pound. While, from 2012, the UK government start increasing their investment in clean energy by knowing their importance, and the ratio start increasing gradually and cross 10 billion pound in 2014. Moreover, in 2015, UK government made an insignificant investment in clean energy, reached around 15 billion pound, hence, this ratio is the highest among over the period.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-07-27 Sanaullah97 61 view
2021-07-26 Sanaullah97 56 view
2020-09-20 asmita acharya 73 view
2020-09-20 asmita acharya view
2019-11-14 rabiya.tnmeis 82 view
Essays by user asmita acharya :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'alternatives'' or 'alternative's'?
Suggestion: alternatives'; alternative's
...t, the ratio of investment in different alternatives energy power was in increasing trend, w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the lowest'.
Suggestion: , the lowest
...rgy power was in increasing trend, while, lowest investment was done in 2008 and highest...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, while, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12994350282 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7834937519 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542372881356 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4554226714 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.714285714 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204496753504 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11171479651 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833132102391 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180496568934 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844590912939 0.0819641961636 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.