The graph below shows annual water usage (in millions of cubic meters) by industries in some country.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows annual water usage (in millions of cubic meters) by industries in some country.

The given bar chart indictaes the annual water consumption of seven different industries in a particular country. As is observed, chemicals industry generally consumed the largest amount of water, while fuel industry needed the lowest quatity of water. Moreover, the majority of industries used more ground water than public supply water.
As can be seen, among seven industries, chemicals industry consumed the highest volume of both ground and public supply water, 430 and 240 millions of cubic meters respectively. The quantities required by metal and paper industries were almost twice less than that by chemicals industry, with 240 and 190 millions of cubic meters of ground water per year accordingly. That figures for public supply water were only 30 and 20 millions of cubic meters, which were far lower than ground water usage. The water consumption of other industries, including fuel, and textiles, were only around 80 and 10 millions of cubic meters per year for ground water and public supply water correspondingly.
In contrast, public supply water demand of food/drinks and machinery industries was mcuh greater than demand for ground water. The figures recorded of food/beverages industry were 190 and 110 millions of cubic meters. Machinery industry reported 100 millions of public water usage and only 10 millions of ground water requirement.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-25 Chandrakumar Chanthujan 78 view
2018-10-02 tejaswi0924 67 view
2018-04-07 Tracy0812 67 view
2018-02-22 Turonxoja 78 view
2015-12-09 prfrance 57 view
Essays by user Tracy0812 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 136, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '240 million'.
Suggestion: 240 million
...ground and public supply water, 430 and 240 millions of cubic meters respectively. The quantiti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 268, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'chemicals'' or 'chemical's'?
Suggestion: chemicals'; chemical's
...ies were almost twice less than that by chemicals industry, with 240 and 190 millions of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 301, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '190 million'.
Suggestion: 190 million
...hat by chemicals industry, with 240 and 190 millions of cubic meters of ground water per year a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 422, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '20 million'.
Suggestion: 20 million
...or public supply water were only 30 and 20 millions of cubic meters, which were far lower than...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 594, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '10 million'.
Suggestion: 10 million
..., and textiles, were only around 80 and 10 millions of cubic meters per year for ground water ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '110 million'.
Suggestion: 110 million
...of food/beverages industry were 190 and 110 millions of cubic meters. Machinery industry report...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '100 million'.
Suggestion: 100 million
...bic meters. Machinery industry reported 100 millions of public water usage and only 10 millions...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '10 million'.
Suggestion: 10 million
...millions of public water usage and only 10 millions of ground water requirement.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, moreover, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1152.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40845070423 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7151091619 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488262910798 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7326829948 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.2 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339028979884 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172194793439 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419898065993 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254103165978 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00268536964318 0.0819641961636 3% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.