The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the amounts of CO2 emitted by each person in four countries over a period of 40 years starting from 1967.
As can be seen from the graph, each Swedish or UK person amounts of CO2 emissions of the UK and Swedish decreasing over the period researched, conversely CO2 emissions in Italy and Portugal showed a rise. So UK citizens are responsible for the most CO2 emission into the environment.
In 1967, about 11 tonnes of CO2 were generated by a UK citizen, followed by 9 tonnes in Sweden. For comparison, each Italian emits more than 4 metric tonnes, about 3.5 metric tonnes of the Portuguese.
From that point on, the average CO2 emissions in the UK gradually decline below 9 tonnes while the figure in Sweden, after increasing by 1 tonne in the first decade, also fell to less than 6 tonnes at the end of the period. In contrast, each person in Italy emits more CO2 with a figure that increased to almost 8 tonnes. In addition, the amounts of emissions in Portugal show a rise of about 6 tonnes in 2007
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- PEOPLE ARE HAVING MORE AND MORE SUGAR BASED DRINKS WHAT ARE THE REASONS WHAT ARE THE SOLUTIONS TO MAKE PEOPLE DRINK LESS 73
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, so, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52941176471 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58827948873 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9879793799 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.875 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203272042457 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982161171301 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044515036795 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126199204324 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422142781361 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.