The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
This line graph illustrates the average production of carbon dioxide per individuals from 1967 to 2007 in four different countries. Those countries are United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal.
In general, the highest CO2 emission produced by United Kingdom throughout 50 years. Likewise, the mos significant dropped between four countries was Sweden.
In 1967, United Kingdom carbon dioxide emission reached the highest among the others, it resulted more than 10 metric tonnes. However, it reduced slightly in the next several years util redulted the lowest at below 10 metris tonnes in 2007. On the other hand, Sweden carbon deoxide emission begins at 9 metric tonnes in the realy yeat. After 10 years, the graph rocheted until reach the maximum high more than 10 metric tonnes, nor it still reached the secon position in 1977. After that, the trend drastically declined in 1987 until the end of 2007.
While Italy and Portugal showed simillar graphs. It began with less than 2 and more than 4 metric tonnes for Portugal and Italy, respectively. Than rose almost 2 metric tonnes for both countries in 1977. In the next few years the trend for Italy increased slowly until reached almost 8 metric tonnes at the end. Simillarity, Portugal showed upward trend and ended with triple amount from the started number.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: SENT_START_THEM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Then'?
Suggestion: Then
...s for Portugal and Italy, respectively. Than rose almost 2 metric tonnes for both co...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, still, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14351851852 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36649259633 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587962962963 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.063888886 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.3571428571 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4285714286 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230751044272 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857951650002 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644891862115 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159370646278 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751839101467 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.