The two maps below show read access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reorting the main features , and make comparisons where relevant.
The pictures describe about the development in the way to reach Cith Hospital in 2007 and 2010. Based on this images tehere were several changes at the time, however most of the were the construction of new transportation areas and the read placement.
In 2007, City Hospital by ring road to created the effictiveness access when there was an emergency situation and reduced tefic. Ring road also connected witg the main access of Hospital Road, nor it provided bus stop besides Hospital Road to accomodate the access. While at the east of Hospital Road there was a car park which enable to used for staff and public.
After 3 years, there were several changes in this hospital. The public car area combined with staff car park in 2007 moved into the east side of City Hospital. Likewise, the bus station was build on the west side of Hospital Road and connected with two road for the entry and exit way. On the south of City Hospital there were two roundbouts which connected with ring road and city road.
Overall, this changes made to improve the accessbility for patient to visited City Hospital.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ith Hospital in 2007 and 2010. Based on this images tehere were several changes at t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, likewise, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79166666667 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43328963288 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526041666667 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.9453271323 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161187078597 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705106829924 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469979200557 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927068512238 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375983690326 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.