The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph compares the amount of carbon dioxide, which was emitted on the midpoint by per capita in four varied European nations, measured statistically in metric tonnes. This comparison commenced in 1967 and sustained until 2007.
Taking a glance from an overall perspective, it is apparent from the data provided that while obviously, co2 production by people saw a considerable drop in UK alongside Sweden, this gas emission witnessed an exponential growth in another two nations that are Italy as well as Portugal in the period of 40 years. It is also worthy to note that British people emitted the most co2 in quantity in metric tonnes, though quite the opposite Portuguese residents produced the least amount of co2.
As is illustrated by the figure, it is palpable that CO2 production in UK was recorded as the highest amount among other three nations that was more than 10 metric tonnes in 1967.Conversely, in the same year the amount of this gas production was the least in quantity in Portugal at 2 metric tonnes.Moreover, the amount of CO2 emission in metric tonnes was measured around 7 in both Italy and Sweden in 1987.
As is shown by this diagram, the sharp drop in CO2 emission in 1977 from almost 11 to around 7 metric tonnes in 1987 was the most noticeable conversion in the entire figure. Furthermore, in 2007 both Swiss and Portuguese residents produced same amount of CO2 that was around 5 metric tonnes on the midpoint.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he midpoint by per capita in four varied European nations, measured statistically...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nced in 1967 and sustained until 2007. Taking a glance from an overall perspect...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts produced the least amount of co2. As is illustrated by the figure, it is p...
^^^
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Conversely
... was more than 10 metric tonnes in 1967.Conversely, in the same year the amount of this ga...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 303, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...quantity in Portugal at 2 metric tonnes.Moreover, the amount of CO2 emission in metric t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 7 in both Italy and Sweden in 1987. As is shown by this diagram, the sharp d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, furthermore, moreover, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87148594378 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78710808623 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518072289157 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 370.8 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 107.89110156 43.030603864 251% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 173.285714286 112.824112599 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.5714285714 22.9334400587 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130087778173 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706146858136 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0270160451692 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088121869838 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219495637662 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.2329268293 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.