The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line graph gives information about changes in the emissions of carbon dioxide per person in four different countries during the period from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, there were general downward trends in the average amount of carbon dioxide in Italy and Portugal, whereas the United Kingdom and Sweden experienced a reverse pattern. It is also clear that the emission in Sweden showed the most dramatic change compared to the other countries.
Around 10.5 metric tonnes of CO2 was emitted in the United Kingdom in 1967, followed by about 8.5 metric tonnes in Sweden. Afterward, the amount of CO2 in the UK decreased constantly to roughly 8.6 metric tonnes in 2007. Over the same period, the figure for Sweden rose suddenly to reach its peak of just over 10 tonnes in 1977 before falling steeply to 5.5 tonnes in the following four decades.
In comparison, there were about 4 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide released in Italy, which was nearly twice as high as that of Portugal in the first year. After going up noticeably to approximately 8 metric tonnes for the former and 5 metric tonnes for the latter, the CO2 emissions in these two countries remained unchanged until the following ten years.
- The graph shows the percentage of university students in 18 25 years old in four countries between 1961 and 2011 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 78
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 78
- MORE AND MORE CHILDREN IN DEVELOPED COUNTRIES ARE BECOMING OVERWEIGHT THIS IS A SERIOUS PROBLEM IN WEALTHY COUNTRIES CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF THIS TREND 89
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...c change compared to the other countries Around 105 metric tonnes of CO2 was emit...
^^^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 55 tonnes in the following four decades In comparison there were about 4 metric ...
^^^
Line 4, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... unchanged until the following ten years
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8137254902 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38326053881 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 204.0 22.4926829268 907% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 982.0 112.824112599 870% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 204.0 22.9334400587 890% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 28.0 5.23603664747 535% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317566983017 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.317566983017 0.103423049105 307% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20332139536 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0921098498215 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 103.2 13.2329268293 780% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -127.12 61.2550243902 -208% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 81.7 10.3012195122 793% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.1 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.32 8.06136585366 215% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 11.4329268293 464% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 83.6 10.9970731707 760% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 53.0 11.0658536585 479% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.