The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the bar chart delineating the average daily minimum and maximum levels of SO2 and N2O which led to air pollution in 2000 in four distinct cities: Los Angeles, Calcutta, Beijing and Mexico City.
Perticibly, Mexico City was influenced the most by two mentioned air pollutants among four cities.
Evidently, the most infinitesimal quantity of SO2 of all cities belonged to Los Angeles, with a minimum average of 2 micrograms per m3 which was five times lower than a maximum one. By contrast, the amount of CO2 released into the air in this city was much higher with 104 microgram m3 for a maximum level. Meanwhile, Mexico City was severely polluted by SO2 and N2O emissions with the daily minimum and maximum of 80, 200, 113 and 207 micrograms per m3 in sequence.
Regarding Beijing and Calcutta, the volume of N2O was less than that of SO2. The daily maximum for SO2 in Beijing reached 100 micrograms per m3 which was about two times larger than that in the Calcutta counterpart. In addition, there was a minute variance of two metropolises maximum of N2O, with 52 and 54 correspondingly.
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities 57
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- More and more people decide to eat healthy food and exercise regularly What are the reasons for this trend What can be done to encourage more people to eat healthier and exercise 73
- The graphs give information about average house prices in England and other parts of the world 78
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78947368421 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74424101087 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1333714009 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0361327053369 0.215688989381 17% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0186453709221 0.103423049105 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0165081037974 0.0843802449381 20% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0203126586206 0.15604864568 13% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181026728943 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.