The graph below shows a typical American and a Japanese office Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant

Given are two layouts of the Typical Office which contrast the Japanese office style and American office style.
Perceptibly, the arrangements are not the same between the two typical offices. While the room is shared by Japanese, the opposite was positive for the American layout style in individualism. Clearly, The private desk appears in American and two sides of the table dividable in Japanese layout style.
In Japanese office layout, the room is occupied by two sets of rectangular tables with six chairs each. The Department Manager table is organized in front of the window which is built in the South side. Section Manager Tables is organized in the head of each table.
In American office layout, the staff is organized in the room middle with the concident of two lines of chair. The eastern side are private room for manager which composes Department Manager Room and Section Manager room. The western sides is accommodated for 2 conference room and office equipment in demand of meeting and avoid disturbance.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...The private desk appears in American and two sides of the table dividable in Japa...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08284023669 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60815891194 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473372781065 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 16.7454471424 43.030603864 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.9 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.9 5.23603664747 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117479080642 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567983454775 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059056367718 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096481790695 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674171632878 0.0819641961636 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.