The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line graph illustrates the general disposal of carbon dioxide (CO2) per individual in four countries, namely the UK, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, while the United Kingdom and Sweden reduced their emissions, Italy and Portugal experienced increases in their domestic carbon dioxide during the time surveyed.
Looking into the graph, it is noticeable that the United Kingdom started the 40-year period with the top position, which was followed by Sweden, Italy and Portugal respectively. During the first ten years, apart from the UK, all other countries emitted an increased amount of carbon dioxide, with the gaps being about 1 ton. Subsequently, Sweden obtained a significant decline from 10 tonnes to 7 tonnes over the next ten years before continuing to undergo a gradual decrease to beneath 6 tonnes in 2007. Italy and Portugal both had an opposite trend, with figures going up gradually from 4 and 1 ton to nearly 8 and 6 tonnes in turn to surpass Sweden regarding the disposal of carbon dioxide. The United Kingdom still topped the chart in 2007, but with a lower number of CO2 emissions of nearly 9 tonnes
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 92
- At present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of old people Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 78
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this 73
- Some People claims that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, regarding, still, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02094240838 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57542667633 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61780104712 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 24.5182148033 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 137.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335201134867 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158350539472 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094503083644 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246650013502 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479806483903 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.