the graph below shows average carbon dioxide (co2) emissions per person in the united kingdom, sweden, italy, and portugual between 1967 and 2007.
The given statistical line chart illustrates average carbon dioxide emissions per person in four nations including the UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal from 1967 and 2007.
Overall, the average CO2 emissions per person in the UK and Sweden had a tendency to drop over the period while it is recorded to increase significantly for the rest two countries.
A first glance at the first two countries which are the UK and Sweden, the UK had its starting point at around 11 metric tonnes which was the highest throughout the four decades. However, this figure was on the decline to 10 metric tonnes in 1987 and gradually dropped to nearly 9 metric tonnes in 2007. Somewhat similarly, in 1967, Sweden gave its beginning point in terms of average CO2 emission at roughly 8 metric tonnes. Then, this data spiked suddenly to over 10 metric tonnes and fell dramatically to under 6 metric tonnes by 2007.
Conversely/Turning to Italy and Portugal, Italy’s average CO2 emission showed a gradual growth, starting at just above 4 metric tonnes and ending at almost 8 metric tonnes. For Portugal, its figure of CO2 emission was recorded to begin at just under 2 metric tonnes and witnessed a constant soar to around 5 metric tonnes at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-23 | nguyen thanh sang | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-23 | nguyen thanh sang | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that university students should pay for their tuition fees because university education only benefits students themselves not society as a whole To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 67
- the graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a european country between 1979 and 2004 84
- the graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 73
- Some people think that to learn about other countries they need to travel Some say that it is not necessary to travel we can have information through TV and internet Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
...ally to under 6 metric tonnes by 2007. Conversely/Turning to Italy and Portugal, Italy’s ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, if, similarly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82242990654 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65716565232 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523364485981 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4545078266 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222842602566 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123693745105 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107895996768 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184172589204 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101738007683 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.