the pie charts show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.
The given pie charts depict the proportion of family speding in six different categories in a region from 1950 to 2010.
Overall, the significant cost of household in the two given period was spent on housing and food. In 1950, it is evident that expenses for health care, transportation, education and other were relatively less noticeable while in 2010, the housing expenditure seemed to be distributed in a balanced way.
Looking at the first data set, the figure for expenditure on housing accounted for 72.1% in 1950 which was the highest percentage while this proportion fell by 50% from 72.1% to 22% in 2010. By the contrary, this shows a reverse trend on the money spent on food which was reported a rate to slightly grow to 34% in 2010.
In 1950, spending on areas namely healthcare, education and transportation made up 2.4%, 6.6% and 3.3% respectively. This proportion of expenditure for healthcare and transportation rose to 4.5% and 14% while that for education experienced a minimal drop of 3%.
- Some people think that technological development can reduce crime while others think that it would encourage crime Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- the graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 67
- more and more people want to buy clothes cars and other products from well known brands what are the reasons do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- The graph below shows the total revenue of three pizza places in Vietnam The figures were taken in 2017 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96470588235 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97918964389 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594117647059 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9312654447 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.571428571 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233498137627 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098936340427 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563568498185 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138501059145 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546357580976 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.