the graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030
The line chart compares different kinds of energy that have been consumed since 1980 along with the amount of energy that is predicted for future use until 2020.
Overall, the consumption of fossil fuels has shown an upward trend while the use of renewable energy has experienced a period of stability. These trends are projected to continue until 2030 with fossil fuels being the dominant sources of power.
A glance at the chart reveals that the use of petrol and oil started at 35 quadrillion units and then this number showed quite a remarkable increase to approximately 45 quadrillion units in 2020 despite a slight fluctuation in the first 15 years. By 2030, the consumption of this type of energy is predicted to rise by around 5 quadrillion units. Following quite a similar pattern, the figures of natural gas and coal fluctuated for the first 40 years and reached around 25 quadrillion units in 2020. However, while the amount of coal consumed in America is projected to go up quite significantly to 30 quadrillion units in 2030, the quantity of natural gas consumed in the same period is foreseen to stay unchanged.
Turning to the other sets of data, nuclear power, solar energy and hydropower shared the same humble starting point of only around 4 quadrillion units. In the next four decades, the amount of nuclear power consumed in the US was reported to show a minimal rise to over 5 quadrillion units and this upward trend is forecast to continue until 2030. Additionally, it was speculated that the amount of solar energy, wind energy and hydropower consumed experienced a period of fluctuation in the first 25 years and then showed insignificant changes for the remaining years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-17 | neverlandforestcat | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-10 | brew | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Trần Như Cát Tường | 78 | view |
- People living in the twenti first century have a better quality of life than people who live in previous centuries To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 67
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period 15 years 73
- Nowadays there is a growing amount of advertising aimed at children Some people think this has negative effects on children and should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that to learn about other countries they need to travel Some say that it is not necessary to travel we can have information through TV and internet Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 965.302439024 146% => OK
No of words: 287.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91986062718 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7535657506 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491289198606 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 435.6 283.868780488 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.9447547656 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.2 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152197300691 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729326328923 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061604676792 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114031472465 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052064893597 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.